Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam accepts manuscripts in the field of research which includes the fields of: Islamic economics, especially in the field of sharia management and sharia banking.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. 

Manuscript articles that submit by online to Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam will be checked by the board of editor regarding scope, in house style, plagiarism. The manuscript that qualifies the focus and scope of Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam will be continued to the review process which, at least, will be reviewed by reviewers with double blind commitment. The reviewer is a journal partner from the experts who concern about the field of journal. The editor will send an e-mail to the chosen reviewer about the title and contien of manuscript, and also the invitation to log in to journal website to finish the review process. The reviewer logs in to journal website to approve doing the review, to download the manuscript, to send their comment, and to choose the recommendation. The reviewing process by reviewer is done at least in two weeks. The result will be returned to the author to be followed up. The qualified paper will be published in Indonesian, English or Arabic. 

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Review Process:

  1. Author submit the manuscript
  2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
  3. Double-blind peer review process
  4. Editor Decision
  5. Confirmation to the authors

EDITORIAL PROCESS

image host

 

Open Access Policy

Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam provides open access service, which means that all the content is available free of charge either person or institution can directly access this journal freely to the public that supports the exchange of global knowledge.
Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full text articles in this journal without asking for prior permission from the Publisher or author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Plagiarism Checker

The Editor may make use of Turnitin & Plagiarism Checker X  for checking the originality of submissions received. 

 

References Management

References to other publications must be in American Psychological Association (APA) style and carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency.

Use Reference Management by Mendeley, Zetero, EndNote.

 

Retraction

The papers published in the Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).
  2. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. It constitutes plagiarism
  4. It reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf

 

Publication Ethics

Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam follow the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE-) in all matters related to the ethics of publication. Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam adapting to meet the highest standards of ethics intended for editors, writers, and Reviewer. Publisher does not have the right to interfere with the integrity of the paper and is only responsible for publishing regularly and on time.

FOR EDITOR

  1. Editor Party Must ensure that writers follow the procedures/rules of writing in the Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam.
  2. The Editor can communicate with the Journal Manager, Editor, and Reviewer other in taking the Final Decision.
  3. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interest
  4. The Editor must provide manuscripts assess objectively without seeing aspects of nationality, ethnicity, political affiliation, ethnicity, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation author.
  5. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interes.
  6. Editors must ensure that the manuscript sent to reviewers do not contain information about the author, and vice versa.
  7. Decisions editors must be delivered to the author with responses Reviewer, except for responses that are personal or libelous.
  8. Editors should honor requests from writers who refuse individuals to evaluate manuscripts for reasons unacceptable.
  9. When the Editor finds or suspects Violation action writing and conflict authorship, editors can follow the guidelines in the flow diagram in resolving conflict COPE authorship.
  10. Editor and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of all the manuscripts received

FOR REVIEWER 

  1. Reviewers are asked to provide an assessment of the substance of the manuscript in accordance with the Focus and Scope Journal and provide recommendations on assessment.
  2. Reviewers are asked to provide comments on the manuscript, if it is suspected find procedural mistakes of writing, publishing and publishing ethics
  3. Mitra Bestari can complete work on at a predetermined time and provide information to the editor if they are unable to meet the time limit specified.
  4. Reviewers must be able to be confidential manuscripts Author.
  5. Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for appraisal, if potential conflicts of interest, both individually and collaboratively with any institution.
  6. Reviewers should ask for consideration to the Editor on the similarity of substance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration or manuscript that was published more in common with Author Author or other.
  7. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

FOR AUTHORS

  1. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and not plagiarism.
  2. The author must ensure that the manuscript has not been published previously and have never been assigned the rights to the article to the other party.
  3. The author ensures that manuscript Send tends to the work itself and follow the standard rules in accordance with the format quoting the appropriate reference.
  4. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and does not engage in plagiarism or automatic plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism.
  5. Authors must follow the procedures established of Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam.
  6. The author does not send the manuscript together with the same topic and title to another journal.
  7. Authors should be able to provide information and make research data related details when the editor discovered the alleged doubts or falsification or plagiarism in the manuscripts. If the author finds any errors or inaccuracies that affect the manuscript which has been sent, the writer must promptly notify the Editor to immediately withdraw the manuscript writing and repairing.
  8. The author is not allowed to withdraw the article being reviewed by the reviewer before being restored by a Reviewer to the Editor.